TIME UP GO TEST FREE

No absolute normative value or MCID is currently determined for the TUG-IC.Ĭlinical Applications: The TUG-IC is best utilized in conjunction with other tests and measures to evaluate and monitor progress of physical mobility and balance in children who are typically developing. The TUG-IC must be used in conjunction with other tests and measures to monitor physical mobility and balance. Weaknesses: The methodology of the TUG may be mistakenly administered in the pediatric population rather than the TUG-IC. Multiple research studies have proven high reliability and validity for this test in the pediatric population. The instructions are simple and understandable for the pediatric population.

TIME UP GO TEST FREE

Strengths: The TUG-IC is free and easy to administer with no special equipment. Psychometric Characteristics: Inter- and intraexaminer ICC of. 1Įnvironment for Testing: indoor, unobstructed hallway with a wall 4Įquipment and Materials Needed: stopwatch, tape, tape measure, goniometer, paper star, and a pediatric sized chair with no armrests 4 TUG(s) = 6.387-(age(y) x 0.166) + (weight (Kg) X 0.014) is an equation to find an age and weight comparable score. 4 No MCID is established in the pediatric population. Type of information, resulting from testing: mean score for preschoolers is 6.7 seconds and the mean score for primary school children is 5.1. Scoring: timed in seconds and compared to normal ranges 4 The timer is started when the child’s bottom leaves the chair and is stopped when the child’s bottom touches the chair again. The child is not instructed on how fast to walk and the test may be restarted if the child skips or hops instead of walks during the test. The child is instructed to touch the star on the wall that is at his/her shoulder height and is 3 meters from the chair.

The chair used is a height that supports hip and knee flexion of 90 degrees. The test consists of a pre-test and a timed test to familiarize the patient with the procedure. Type of Test: evaluative screening test or outcome measureĪdministration: The structure of the TUG-IC differs from the standard TUG to increase validity in the pediatric population. Purpose: To test functional ambulatory mobility including balance and difficulty turning during gait of children with or without physical disabilities and to monitor change over time. E-mail: 4Ĭosts: free, however a diagram and data collection worksheet for the TUG-IC can be found in the reference book for pediatric normative values by Parrot. Correspondence at School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. Source: Mary P Galea, PhD BAppSc(Physio) BA, School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 4 Also referred to as a Modified Timed Up and Go Test.Īuthors: Williams EN, Carrol SG, Reddihough DS et al. Title, Edition, Dates of Publication and Revision: Timed ‘Up and Go’ Test in Children (TUG-IC), 2005, adapted from Podsiadlo and Richardson’s Timed ‘Up and Go’ Test, 1991. Physical therapists should be aware of this variability before they interpret the TUG score for a particular individual.Posted on: Ma| By: apope2 | Filed under: Timed up and go (TUG) Despite high intraclass correlation coefficients, the ranges of expected variability can be wide and are similar within and between raters.

The variability increases with the time to perform the TUG. The measurement error of a TUG assessment is substantial for a frail older person dependent in ADL, regardless of the level of cognitive function, when verbal cuing is permitted during testing. In repeated measurements at the individual level, an observed value of 10 seconds was expected to vary from 7 to 15 seconds and an observed value of 40 seconds was expected to vary from 26 to 61 seconds for 95% of the observations. 90 and were similar within and between raters. The intraclass correlations were greater than. There was a significant relationship between the variability and the time taken to perform the TUG. Intrarater and interrater analyses were carried out.Ĭognitive impairment was not related to the size of the variability of TUG scores. The TUG assessments were performed on 3 different days. The subjects were 84.8+/-5.7 (mean+/-SD) years of age, and their Mini-Mental State Examination score was 18.7+/-5.6. Seventy-eight subjects with multiple impairments, dependent in ADL, and living in residential care facilities were included in this study. The hypothesis was that cognitive impairment would increase the variability of TUG scores. The aim of the present study was to investigate the expected variability of TUG scores in older subjects dependent in activities of daily living (ADL) and with different levels of cognitive state. It is unknown how cognitive impairment affects the reliability of Timed 'Up & Go' Test (TUG) scores.

Time up go test